Meta-Information and Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

Victor S. Melo, Alison R. Panisson, Rafael H. Bordini

Resumo


In this work we compile our research regarding meta-information in multi-agent systems. In particular, we describe some agents profiles represent- ing different attitudes which describe how agents consider meta-information in their decisions-making and reasoning processes. Furthermore, we describe how we have combined different meta-information available in multi-agent systems with an argumentation-based reasoning mechanism. In our approach, agents are able to decide more conflicts between information/arguments, given that they are able to use different meta-information (often combined) to decide between such conflicting information. Our framework for meta-information in multi- agent systems was implemented based on a modular architecture, thus other meta-information can be added, as well as different meta-information can be combined in order to create new agents profiles. Therefore, in our approach, different agents profiles can be instantiated for different application domains, allowing flexibility in the choice of how agents will deal with conflicting infor- mation in those particular domains.


Palavras-chave


Multi-agent systems; Meta-information; Argumentation

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Adria ́n Biga, A. C. (2014). G-jason: An extension of jason to engineer agents capable to reason under uncertainty. In Proceedings of 14th Intelligent Agent and Systems Workshop.

Amgoud, L. and Ben-Naim, J. (2015). Argumentation-based ranking logics. In Pro- ceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 1511–1519. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Mul- tiagent Systems.

Berariu, T. (2014). An argumentation framework for bdi agents. In Zavoral, F., Jung, J. J., and Badica, C., editors, Intelligent Distributed Computing VII, volume 511 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pages 343–354. Springer International Publishing.

Bordini, R. H., Hu ̈bner, J. F., and Wooldridge, M. (2007a). Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason (Wiley Series in Agent Technology). John Wiley & Sons.

Bordini, R. H., Hu ̈bner, J. F., and Wooldridge, M. (2007b). Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason (Wiley Series in Agent Technology), volume 8. John Wiley & Sons.

da Costa Pereira, C., Tettamanzi, A. G., and Villata, S. (2011). Changing one’s mind: Erase or rewind? possibilistic belief revision with fuzzy argumentation based on trust. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial In- telligence, volume 1, pages 164–171.

Demolombe, R. (2011). Transitivity and propagation of trust in information sources: An analysis in modal logic. In International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi- Agent Systems, pages 13–28. Springer.

Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non- monotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321–357.

Falcone, R. and Castelfranchi, C. (2010). Trust and transitivity: a complex deceptive relationship. In Proceedings of the 12th AAMAS workshop on trust in agent societies (Trust), pages 43–54.

Governatori, G., Maher, M. J., Antoniou, G., and Billington, D. (2004). Argumentation semantics for defeasible logic. J. Log. Comput., 14(5):675–702.

Lu, G., Lu, J., Yao, S., and Yip, Y. J. (2009). A review on computational trust models for multi-agent systems. The open information science journal, 2:18–25.

Melo, V. S., Panisson, A. R., and Bordini, R. H. (2016a). Argumentation-based reasoning using preferences over sources of information. In fifteenth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).

Melo, V. S., Panisson, A. R., and Bordini, R. H. (2016b). Argumentation-based reason- ing using preferences over sources of information: (extended abstract). In Proceed- ings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’16, pages 1337–1338,

Richland, SC. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

Melo, V. S., Panisson, A. R., and Bordini, R. H. (2016c). Metainformações como critérios de decisão entre informações conflitantes em sistemas multiagentes. In XIII Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional, pages 541–552.

Melo, V. S., Panisson, A. R., and Bordini, R. H. (2016d). Trust on beliefs: Source, time and expertise. In eighteenth International Workshop on Trust in Agent societies.

Nute, D. (1993). Defeasible Prolog. Research report (University of Georgia. Artificial Intelligence Programs). Artificial Intelligence Programs, University of Georgia.

Nute, D. (1994). Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming. In Gabbay, D. M., Hogger, C. J., and

Robinson, J. A., editors, Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming, chapter Defeasible logic, pages 353– 395. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

Panisson, A. R. and Bordini, R. H. (2016). Knowledge representation for argumentation in agent-oriented programming languages. In 2016 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems, BRACIS 2015.

Panisson, A. R., Freitas, A., Schmidt, D., Hilgert, L., Meneguzzi, F., Vieira, R., and Bor- dini, R. H. (2015). Arguing About Task Reallocation Using Ontological Information in Multi-Agent Systems. In 12th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multiagent Systems.

Panisson, A. R., Melo, V. S., and Bordini, R. H. (2016). Using preferences over sourcesof information in argumentation-based reasoning. In2016 5th Brazilian Conference onIntelligent Systems (BRACIS), pages 31–36.

Panisson, A. R., Meneguzzi, F., Vieira, R., and Bordini, R. H. (2014). An Approach for Argumentation-based Reasoning Using Defeasible Logic in Multi-Agent Programming Languages. In 11th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multiagent Systems.

Parsons, S., Atkinson, K., Haigh, K., Levitt, K., Rowe, P. M. J., Singh, M. P., and Sklar, E. (2012a). Argument schemes for reasoning about trust. Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2012, 245:430.

Parsons, S. and McBurney, P. (2003). Argumentation-based dialogues for agent co- ordination. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(5):415–439.

Parsons, S., Sklar, E., and McBurney, P. (2012b). Using argumentation to reason with and about trust. In Argumentation in multi-agent systems, pages 194–212. Springer.

Parsons, S., Tang, Y., Sklar, E., McBurney, P., and Cai, K. (2011). Argumentation-based reasoning in agents with varying degrees of trust. In The 10th International Confer- ence on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 2, pages 879–886. Inter- national Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., and Amgoud, L. (2002). An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues. In 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pages 394–401. ACM Press.

Pinyol, I. and Sabater-Mir, J. (2013). Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 40(1):1–25.

Schmidt, D., Panisson, A. R., Freitas, A., Bordini, R. H., Meneguzzi, F., and Vieira, R. (2016). An ontology-based mobile application for task managing in collaborative groups. In Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pages 522–526.

Tang, Y., Cai, K., McBurney, P., Sklar, E., and Parsons, S. (2011). Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief. Journal of Logic and Computation, page 38.

Walton, D. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Routledge. Walton, D., Reed, C., and Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge

University Press.

Wooldridge, M. (2009). An introduction to multiagent systems. John Wiley & Sons.




Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


iSys - Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação - CESI/SBC
ISSN Eletrônico: 1984-2902