Sejamos Pragmáticos: Pesquisas em Sistemas de Informação com Relevância e Rigor
Mots-clés :
Paradigma pragmático, Pesquisa em Sistemas de Informação, Métodos mistos, Rigor e relevânciaRésumé
O pragmatismo pode ser definido como uma doutrina que considera as coisas a partir de um ponto de vista prático. O pragmatismo prega que a ação e a relevância prática devem ser os pontos chave da pesquisa científica. O paradigma pragmático tem se apresentado como alternativa paradigmática do positivismo e do interpretativismo, possibilitando a solução de problemas inerentes dos paradigmas dominantes, positivismo e interpretativismo. O presente artigo apresenta, a partir de um levantamento bibliográfico, o paradigma pragmático, realizando uma comparação com outros paradigmas, assim como a utilização de métodos quantitativos, qualitativos e mistos, a partir de uma perspectiva de relevância prática com rigor metodológico.
Téléchargements
Références
ARENS E. The logic of pragmatic thinking. From Peirce to Habermas, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands. 1994.
BASKERVILLE, Richard; MYERS, Michael D. Special issue on action research in information systems: Making IS research relevant to practice: Foreword. Mis Quarterly, p. 329-335, 2004. [GS Search]
BENBASAT, Izak; ZMUD, Robert W. Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS quarterly, p. 3-16, 1999. [GS Search]
CRESWELL, John W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2013.
CRESWELL, John W.; CLARK, Vicki L. Plano. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications. 2007.
CRONEN; V. Practical theory, practical art, and the pragmatic-systemic account of inquiry. Communication theory, Vol 11 (1), p 14-35, 2001. [GS Search]
DARKE, Peta; SHANKS, Graeme; BROADBENT, Marianne. Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information systems journal, v. 8, n. 4, p. 273-289, 1998. [GS Search]
DAVIS, Gerald F. Do theories of organizations progress?. Organizational Research Methods, v. 13, n. 4, p. 690-709, 2010. [GS Search]
DE ANDRADE, Matheus Lemos et al. A Miopia Paradigmática e os Jogos da Verdade nas Pesquisas de Marketing. REMark, v. 16, n. 3, p. 383, 2017. [GS Search]
DEWEY, J. The development of American pragmatism. In H. S. Thayer (Ed.) (1989), Pragmatism: The classic writings (pp. 23-40). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. 1931.
DIETZ, Jan LG. Understanding and modelling business processes with DEMO. In: ER. 1999. p. 188-202. [GS Search]
FEILZER, Martina Yvonne. Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of mixed methods research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 6-16, 2010. [GS Search]
FISHMAN, Daniel. The case for pragmatic psychology. NYU Press, 1999.
GALVÃO, Maria Cristiane Barbosa. O levantamento bibliográfico e a pesquisa científica. Fundamentos de epidemiologia. 2ed. A, v. 398, p. 1-377, 2010. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. Meanings of pragmatism: Ways to conduct information systems research. Action in Language, Organisations and Information Systems, 2004. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 21, n. 2, p. 135-146, 2012. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. What kind of pragmatism in information systems research. In: AIS SIG Prag inaugural meeting. 2008. [GS Search]
GOLES, Tim; HIRSCHHEIM, Rudy. The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead… long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan. Omega, v. 28, n. 3, p. 249-268, 2000. [GS Search]
GUBA, Egon G.; LINCOLN, Yvonna S. Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies. Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education, p. 89-115, 1988.
HEVNER, Alan; CHATTERJEE, Samir. Design research in information systems: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
HEVNER, A. R.; MARCH, S.T.; PARK, J. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quaterly, v. 28, n. 1, p. 75-105, 2004. [GS Search]
JAMES, William. Pragmatism, a New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Popular Lectures. 1907.
KUHN, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Vol. 1962.
KWAN, Becky SC. A cross-paradigm macro-structure analysis of research articles in Information Systems. English for Specific Purposes, v. 45, p. 14-30, 2017. [GS Search]
LAUGHLIN, Richard. Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middle-range” thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 8, n. 1, p. 63-87, 1995. [GS Search]
LEE, Allen S. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS quarterly, p. 29-33, 1999. [GS Search]
MACKENZIE, Noella; KNIPE, Sally. Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in educational research, v. 16, n. 2, p. 193-205, 2006. [GS Search]
MEAD, George Herbert. The philosophy of the act. 1938.
MERTENS, Donna M. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications, 2014.
MORGAN, David L. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of mixed methods research, v. 1, n. 1, p. 48-76, 2007. [GS Search]
MYERS, Michael D.; AVISON, David. An introduction to qualitative research in information systems. 2002.
O'LEARY, Zina. The essential guide to doing your research project. Sage, 2017.
ORLIKOWSKI, Wanda J.; BAROUDI, Jack J. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information systems research, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-28, 1991. [GS Search]
PARVAIZ, Gohar Saleem et al. Pragmatism for Mixed Method Research at Higher Education Level. Business & Economic Review, v. 8, n. 2, p. 67-79, 2016. [GS Search]
PEIRCE, Charles S. Collected Papers (Vols. 1-8). 1931.
PINTO, Nelson Guilherme Machado et al. A Aproximação De Trabalhos Acadêmicos No Universo Organizacional Nas Ciências Administrativas: Uma Análise Dos Trabalhos Do Encontro Da Associação Nacional De Pós-Graduação E Pesquisa Em Administração De 2014. Revista UNEMAT de Contabilidade, v. 5, n. 9, 2016. [GS Search]
POWELL, Thomas C. Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic management journal, v. 22, n. 9, p. 875-888, 2001. [GS Search]
RATHBUN, Brian Christopher. Interviewing and qualitative field methods: pragmatism and practicalities. In: The Oxford handbook of political methodology. 2008.
ROBSON, Colin; MCCARTAN, Kieran. Real world research. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Um discurso sobre as ciências. Porto (Portugal): Afrontamento, 1999. [GS Search]
SCHULTZ, Majken. Reconciling pragmatism and scientific rigor. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 19, n. 3, p. 274-277, 2010. [GS Search]
SHUSTERMAN, Richard. Pragmatism and East‐Asian Thought. Metaphilosophy, v. 35, n. 1‐2, p. 13-43, 2004. [GS Search]
SYMONDS, Jenny E.; GORARD, S. The death of mixed methods: research labels and their casualties. In: British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. 2008. [GS Search]
TASHAKKORI, Abbas; TEDDLIE, Charles. The Past and the Future of Mixed Methods Research: From ‘Methodological Triangulation’ to ‘Mixed Methods Designs’. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, p. 671-701, 2003.
TEDDLIE, Charles; TASHAKKORI, Abbas. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, p. 3-50, 2003.
THAYER, Horace Standish. Meaning and action: A critical history of pragmatism. Hackett Publishing, 1981.
TRAUTH, Eileen M. The choice of qualitative methods in IS research. Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends, 2001.
ULRICH, Werner. Philosophy for professionals: Towards critical pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 58, n. 8, p. 1109-1113, 2007. [GS Search]
VENKATESH, Viswanath; BROWN, Susan A.; BALA, Hillol. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS quarterly, v. 37, n. 1, 2013. [GS Search]
WALSHAM, Geoff. Doing interpretive research. European journal of information systems, v. 15, n. 3, p. 320-330, 2006. [GS Search]
WICKS, Andrew C.; FREEMAN, R. Edward. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization science, v. 9, n. 2, p. 123-140, 1998. [GS Search]
