ARTISTIC RESEARCH
ARTISTIC RESEARCH – THE DIFFERENCE THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE
Keywords:
Artistic research, Methodological pluralism, Experimentation, Embodied knowledge, Societal impactAbstract
Already in 1993, cultural theorist Christopher Frayling in Research in Art and Design introduced a distinction between three types of arts research: research into art, research for art, and research through art (Frayling 1993). In 2006, the Dutch philosopher and social scientist Henk Borgdorff adopted this trichotomy, albeit slightly rethought and reformulated. He distinguished between research on the arts (investigating the arts from a theoretical distance), research for the arts (research providing insights and instruments that could possibly find their way into concrete art practices), and, finally, research in the arts (Borgdorff 2006). This last, nowadays known as Artistic Research, no longer assumes the separation of subject and object or a distance between a researcher and their art practice. Instead, the artistic practice itself is an essential component of both the research process and its outcomes.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.