A morte lhe cai bem: reconsiderando o significado do mobiliário funerário na construção do prestígio social

Camila Diogo de Souza

doi:10.9789/2525-3050.2018.v3i6.263-287

Autores/as

Camila Diogo de Souza Centro de Antropologia e Arqueologia Forense (CAAF). Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Rua Sena Madureira, 1500, Vila Clementino 04021-001 – São Paulo, SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9789/2525-3050.2018.v3i6.263-287

Palabras clave:

Arqueologia funerária – Mobiliário funerário – Prestígio social – Contextos funerários – Memória social

Resumen

Este artigo tem como objetivo discutir o papel do mobiliário funerário (ou acompanhamentos) na construção do prestígio e da memória social, a partir da apresentação de um estudo de caso específico. Os objetos depositados com os mortos, desde as abordagens teórico-metodológicas mais antigas dos estudos dos contextos funerários, constituíram o elemento central da cultura material de natureza funerária sobre o qual os pesquisadores se debruçavam para reconstruir aspectos da organização social e alcançar aspectos simbólicos dos rituais mortuários. Contudo, devido à caraterística multifacetada do registro arqueológico dos sepultamentos, as análises interdisciplinares têm possibilitado reconsiderar as relações entre os artefatos e os valores socioculturais de riqueza e prestígio, sob a ótica das diferentes abordagens interpretativas das linhas teórico-metodológicas da Arqueologia Funerária.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Camila Diogo de Souza, Centro de Antropologia e Arqueologia Forense (CAAF). Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Rua Sena Madureira, 1500, Vila Clementino 04021-001 – São Paulo, SP

Doutora em Arqueologia Clássica pelo Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia (MAE), junto à Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Professora Visitante Centro de Antropologia e Arqueologia Forense (CAAF), da Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). Pós-doutoranda pelo MAE-USP.

Citas

BINFORD, Lewis R. “Mortuary Practices: their study and their potential”. In: Memoirs of the Society for the American Archaeology. No. 25, Brown, J. Approaches to the social dimension of mortuary practices. American Antiquity (36), p. 6-29, 1971.

BUIKSTRA, Jane E. & BECK, Lane A. (Eds.). Bioarchaeology: The Contextual Study of Human Remains. Burlingtion: Academic Press, 2006. 628p.

CHILDE, Vere Gordon. The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1929. 479p.

CHILDE, Vere Gordon. Directional Changes in Funerary Practices during 50,000 Years. Man. London, v. 45, p. 13-19, jan./feb. 1945.

COURBIN, Paul. Une Tombe Géométrique d’Argos. Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique. Athènes, v. 81, p. 322-386, 1957.

COURBIN, Paul. La céramique géométrique d’Argos. Paris: De Boccard, 1966. 596p. 152 pranchas.

COURBIN, Paul. Les Tombes Géométriques d’Argos, I (1952-1958). Études Péloponnésiennes VII. École Française d’Athènes, Paris: Librairie J. Vrin, 1974. 155p. 55 pranchas.

COURBIN, Paul. La Signification du Géométrique Argien. In: PIÉRART, Marcel (Ed.). Polydipsion Argos: Argos de la fin des palais mycéniens à la constitution de l’État classique. Friburg (Suisse), 7-9 mai 1987. Études rassemblées par Marcel Piérart. Supplément au Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique. Athènes, v. 22, p. 55-68, 1992.

CROSSLAND, Zoë. Materiality and embodiment. In: HICKS, Dan & BEAUDRY, Mary (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 386-405, 2010.

DUDAY, Henri. The Archaeology of the Dead: Lectures in Archaeothanatology. Translated by Anna Maria Cipriani and John Pearce. Oakville: Oxford Oxbow Books, 2009. 230p.

DUDAY, Henri et al. L’Anthropologie «de terrain»: reconnaissance et interprétation des gestes funéraires. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris. Paris, v. 2, n. 3, p. 29- 49, 1990.

DUPLOUY, Alain. Le prestige des élites: recherches sur les modes de reconnaissance sociale en Grèce entre les Xe et Ve siècles avant J.-C. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2006. 414p.

GOULD, John. Myth, ritual, memory, and exchange: essays in Greek literature and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 440p.

HÄGG, Robin. Die Gräber der Argolis in sumykenischer, protogeometrischer und geometrischer Zeit. 1: Lage und Form der Gräber. BOREAS. Uppsala, v. 7, p. 1, 1974.

HÄGG, Robin. Some aspects of the burial customs of the Argolid in the Dark Age. Athens Annals of Archaeology. Athens, n. 13, p. 119-26, 1980.

HÄGG, Robin. Zur Stadtwerdung des dorischen Argos. In: PAPENFUSS, Dietrich & STROCKA, Volker Michael Strocka (Eds.). Palast und Hütte: Beiträge zum Bauen und Wohnen im Altertun von Archäologen, Vor- und Frühgeschichtlern. Tagungsbeiträge eines Symposiuns der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung Bonn – Bad Godesberg veranstaltet vom 25-30 November 1979 in Berlim. Berlim: Zaberndruck, Mainz am Rhein, p. 297-307, 1982.

HÄGG, Robin. Burial Customs and Social Differentiation in 8th-Century Argos. In: HÄGG, Robin & MARINATOS, Nanno. The Greek Renaissance of the Eight Century B. C.: Tradition and Innovation. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium at the Swedish Institute in Athens, 1-5 June, 1981. Stockholm: Svenska instituet, p. 27-31, 1983.

HÄGG, Robin. Argos and Its Neighbours: Regional Variations in the Burial Practices in the Protogeometric and Geometric Periods. In: PARIENTE, Anne & TOUCHAIS, Gilles (Eds). Argos et l’Argolide: Topographie et urbanisme. Actes de la Table ronde organisée par l’École française d’Athènes et la 4e Éphorie des antiquités préhistoriques et classiques, Athènes-Argos, 28 avril- 1er mai 1990, Paris. Athènes : Ecole française d’Athènes, p. 131-135, 1998.

HAPIOT, Laurence. Alimentation, hygiène et environnement sanitaire dans le monde égéen ancien. Thèse (Doctorat), Département d’Archéologie, Université Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, 2015. 262p.

JOYCE, Rosemary. Archaeology of the body. Annual Review of Anthropology. Palo Alto, v. 34, p. 139-158, 2005.

KINDT, Julia. Rethinking Greek Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 250p.

KNAPPETT, Carl. An Archaeology of Interaction: Network perspectives on material culture and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 262p.

KNÜSEL, Christopher J. Crouching in fear: Terms of engagement for funerary remains. Journal of Social Archaeology. Online, v. 14, n. 1, p. 26-58, 2014.

KRYSTALLI-VOTSI, Kalliope. Cratère Géométrique d’Argos. Supplément du Bulletin de correspondance hellénique. Paris, n. 6, p. 85-92, 1980.

LANGDON, Susan. Beyond the Grave: Biographies from Early Greece. American Journal of Archaeology. Boston, v. 105, n. 4, p. 579-606, 2001.

LANGDON, Susan. Art and Identity in Dark Age Greece, 1100-700 B.C.E. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 408p.

LESURE, Richard G. Linking theory and evidence in an archaeology of human agency: Iconography, style, and theories of embodiment. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. Online, v. 12, n. 3, p. 237-255, 2005.

LOWENTHAL, David. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. 489p.

MACKINNON, Michael. State of the Discipline: Osteological Research in Classical Archaeology. American Journal of Archaeology. Boston, v. 111, n. 3, p. 473-504, 2007.

MORGAN, Catherine & WHITELAW, Todd. Pots and Politics: ceramic evidence for the rise of the Argive state. American Journal of Archaeology. Boston, v. 95, n. 1, p. 79-108, 1991.

MORRIS, Ian. Burial and Ancient Society: The rise of the Greek city-state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 262p.

MULLIEZ, Dominique & BANAKA-DIMAKI, Anna (Eds). Sur le pas de Wilhelm Vollgraff: Cent ans d’activités archéologiques à Argos. Actes du Colloque International organisé par la IVe EPKA et l’École française d’Athènes, 25-28 septembre 2003. Recherches Franco-helléniques IV. Athènes: EfA; Paris: De Boccard, 2013. 446p.

NAGY, Gregory, Greek Mythology and Poetics (Cornell University Press, 1990. 363p.

NORA, Pierre. Between Memory and History: les lieux de mémoire. Representations. Berkeley, CA, Special issue n. 26, p. 7-24, 1989.

OAKLEY, John H. Danae and Perseus on Seriphos. American Journal of Archaeology. Boston, v. 86, n. 1, p. 111-115, 1982.

PAPPI, Evangelia. Argive Geometric Figured Style. The rule and the exception. In: RYSTEDT, Eva & WELLS, Berit (Eds.) Pictorial Pursuits: Figurative Painting on Mycenaean & Geometric Pottery. Papers from Two seminars at the Swedish Institute at Athens in 1999 & 2001. Acta. Inst. Athen. Sueciae, Series in 4o, LIII. Stockholm: Distributor Paul Åströms Förlag, p. 229-237, 2006.

PAPPI, Evangelia & TRIANTAPHILLOU, Sevi. Mortuary Practices and the Human Remains: a preliminary study of the geometric graves in Argos, Argolid. In: MAZARAKIS-AINIAN, Alexandros (Ed.) The “Dark Ages” Revisited: Acts of an International Conference in Memory of William D. E. Coulson, Volos 14-17 June, 2007. Volume II. Volos: University of Thessaly Press, p. 673-688, 2011.

PARKER, Robert. On Greek Religion. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 2011. 328p.

PARKER-PEARSON, Mike. The Powerful Death: Archaeological Relationships between the Living and the Death. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. Cambridge, v. 3, n. 2, p. 203-229, 1993.

PARKER-PEARSON, Mike. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Stroud: Allan Sttun, 1999. 250p.

RADLEY, Alan. Artefactos, memória e sentido del passado. In: MIDDLETON, David & EDWARD, Derek (Orgs.). Memória compartida: la naturaleza social del recuerdo y del olvido. Buenos Aires: Paidos, p. 63-76, 1992.

RIBEIRO, Marily Simões. Arqueologia das Práticas Mortuárias: uma abordagem historiográfica. São Paulo: Alameda, 2007. 194p.

ROBERTS, Helle Salskov. Pots for the living, pots for the dead: Were pots purpose-made for the funeral or reused? Can inscriptions throw light on the problem? In: RATHJE, Annette; NIELSEN, Marjatta & RASMUSSEN, Bodil Bundgaard (Eds.). Pots for the living, pots for the dead. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, p. 9-32, 2002.

ROWLANDS, Michael. The role of memory in the transmission of culture. World Archaeology. Abingdon, v. 25, n. 2, p. 141-171, 1993.

SAXE, Arthur. Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices. Michigan University: Ann Arbor Microfilm, 1970. 240p.

SCHIFFER, Michael B. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1996. 448p.

SHANKS, Michael. Art and an Archaeology of Embodiment: some aspects of Archaic Greece. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. Cambridge, v. 5, n. 2, p. 207-244, 1995.

SHANKS, Michael. Art and the Greek city state: an interpretive archaeology. New Studies in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 237p.

SILVA, Sergio Francisco Serafim Monteiro da. Terminologias e classificações usadas para descrever sepultamentos humanos: exemplos e sugestões. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia. São Paulo, 15-16, p. 113-138, 2005-2006.

SILVA, Sergio Francisco Serafim Monteiro da. Arqueologia Funerária: corpo, cultura e sociedade. Ensaios sobre a interdisciplinaridade no estudo das práticas mortuárias. Recife: Editora da UFPE, 2014. 133p.

SNODGRASS, Anthony. Homer and the Artists: Text and Picture in Early Greek Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 200p.

SOFAER, Joanna R. The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 208p.

SOURVINOU-INWOOD, Christiane. “Reading” Greek culture: texts and images, rituals and myths. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. 315p.

DE SOUZA, Camila Diogo. As Práticas Mortuárias na região da Argólida entre os séculos XI e VIII a.C. São Paulo: Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia; Imprensa Oficial, 2011. 320p.

DE SOUZA, Camila Diogo. Aportes arqueológicos na produção do conhecimento histórico. Cadernos do LEPAARQ. Pelotas, v. 12, n. 24, p. 1-19, 2015a.

DE SOUZA, Camila Diogo. A Arte Geométrica grega: considerações sobre a análise dos motivos figurados do repertório iconográfico geométrico argivo (c. 900 a 700 a.C.). Calíope: Presença Clássica. Rio de Janeiro, ano 32, n. 29, p. 61-95, 2015b. Disponível em: <https://revistas.ufrj.br/ index.php/caliope/article/view/7410/7097>. Acesso em 11/11/2018.

DE SOUZA, Camila Diogo. Considerations about burials and funerary practices in Geometric Argos, Greece (from ca. 900 to 700 B.C.E.). In: ROCHA, Leonor, BUENO‐RAMIRES, Primitiva & BRANCO, Gertrudes (Eds.).

Death as Archaeology of Transition: Thoughts and Materials. Papers from the II International Conference of Transition Archaeology: Death Archaeology, 29th April – 1st May 2013. BAR International Series 2708. Oxford: Archaeopress, p. 307-318, 2015c.

DE SOUZA, Camila Diogo. As representações da morte na arte geométrica grega do século VIII a.C.: expressões de identidade coletiva ou individual. In: ORTEGA, Any Marise & PELOGGIA, Alex Ubiratan Goossens (Orgs.). Entre o Arcaico e o Contemporâneo: ensaios fluindo entre Arqueologia, Psicanálise, Antropologia e Geologia. São Paulo: IGLU Editora, p. 81-118, 2015d.

DE SOUZA, Camila Diogo. Cultuando os mortos e as divindades: expressões da religiosidade e a formação da polis grega no Período Geométrico (900 a 700 a.C.). In: DIAS, Carolina Kesser Barcellos; SILVA, Semíramis Corsi e CAMPOS, Carlos Eduardo da Costa (Orgs.). Experiências Religiosas no Mundo Antigo. Volume II. Curitiba: Editora Prismas, p. 121-144, 2017.

TAINTER, Joseph A. Social Inference and Mortuary Practices: an experiment in numerical classification. World Archaeology. Abingdon, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-15, 1975.

VAN DYKE, Ruth M. & ALCOCK, Susan E. (eds.). Archaeologies of Memory. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. 256p.

WILLIAMS, Howard (ed.). Archaeologies of Remembrance: Death and memory in past societies. New York, Boston: Kluwer Academic; Plenum Publishers, 2003. 310p.