THE FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY IN GERMANY

Autores

  • Margherita Paola Poto

Resumo

The present contribution aims to illustrate the German regulatory system in financial supervision, its structure and its flexibility to hold out against the storms of the perduring critical situation in the financial system. The bird’s eye view depicts a consolidated system, where a single regulator supervises the three segments of the financial market (securities stricto sensu, banks and insurance), and where the independence from the executive rather than being flaunted as the winning choice, has been set aside in favour of a “delegation of powers”, since the authority is a federal institution that belongs to the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Finance. In addition to the relevant role of the German Financial Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdientleistungsaufsicht, hereinafter the Bafin) played at national level, it is noteworthy its relevant stature at international level, given the explicit mandate of the Bafin to engage in international administrative cooperation. The Bafin plays a key role in implementing the global financial standards set out in the Basel Accords. In the first part of the contribution, I will analyse the authority and its characteristics, particularly focusing on the element of the independence in legislation, on its interpretation in jurisprudence, and on its specifity in the national system. The second part of the contribution will tackle the other delicate aspect related to the regulatory authorities in Germany, the public administration liability in case of damages to third people, its constitutional grounds and the extensive interpretation of its mechanisms to the authority supervising financial markets. Some concluding remarks will lead this contribution to an end.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Margherita Paola Poto

Professor in Administrative Law, University of Turin, Italy

Referências

CARL. Schmitt, Das Problem der innerpolitischen Neutralitaet, now in Verfassungsgericht Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924-1925, Berlin, 1958, 41.

CASE C-518/07. European Commission v. Federal Republic of Germany, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2010 [2010] ECR1-1885; in Common Market Law Review, 2012, p. 1755-1768.

CLARICH, M. La responsabilità della Consob nell’esercizio della funzione di vigilanza: due passi oltre la sentenza della Corte di cassazione n. 500/99, in Danno e resp., 2002, 346.

DANN, M. V. Engelhardt, The Global Administrative Order through a German Lens: Perception and Influence of Legal Structures of Global Governance in Germany, in German Law Journal, 1 July 2011, p. 1383.

DEHLINGER, K.D. Vertragliche Marktsegmentregulierung an Wertpapierbörsen, Baden Baden, 2003.

DI CAPUA, C. Il sistema bancario tedesco, in Quaderni di Ricerche realizzati nell’ambito della ricerca «Verso un sistema bancario e finanziario europeo», a cura dell’Ente per gli Studi Monetari, Bancari e Finanziari Luigi Einaudi, n. 56, 2003.

DIJKSTRA, R.J.Liability of Financial Supervisory Authorities in the European Union,

Journal of European Tort Law, 2012.

DOMANSKI, D. The impact of financial regulation on financial structures in post-war Germany, in Quaderni di Ricerche realizzati nell’ambito della ricerca «Verso un sistema bancario e finanziario europeo», a cura dell’Ente per gli Studi Monetari, Bancari e Finanziari Luigi Einaudi, n. 45, 2003, 10.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. The High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU chaired by J. de Larosière, Report,Brussels, 25February, 2009: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/finances/docs/de_larosiere_report_en.pdf, last visited in May 2013.

HORN, J. «Germany», in Banking Supervision in the European Community. Institutional Aspects, Brussels, Edition de l’ULB, 1995.

HORSTMANN, W. Das öffentliche Interesse und seine Vertretung vor den Verwaltungsgerichten, Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der juristichen Doktorwürde der Rechts -und Staatswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität zu Göttingen, Göttingen, 1938.

MARKESINIS, B.S. The German Law of Obligations, vol. II, The Law of Torts: A Comparative Introduction, Oxford, 1997.

MAYER, O. Die Haftung des Staates für rechtswidrige Amtshandlungen, in Sächsisches Archiv fürr Rechtspflege, 1913.

MWENDA, K. K. Legal aspects of Unified Financial Services Supervision in Germany, in German Law Journal, 2003, 4, 10.

POTO, M. The System of Financial Supervision in Europe - Origin, Developments and Risk of Overruling, in EJRR, Symposium on the Financial Crisis in the Europe (Part 2), n. 4/2011, p. 491.

RAINER, R. Die doppelte Abhangigkeit des subjectiven öffentlichen Rechts, in Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt, 1996, 641.

RUDOLF, B. The enforcement of Judgements against Public Authorities in the Federal Republic of Germany, European Public Law, 2001.

SCHIEDERMAIR, C. European financial supervisors cooperate across sector boundaries, pubblicato in Q3/07, Bafin Quarterly, 3rd Quarter Edition 2007.

SCHÜLER, M. Integrated financial supervision in Germany, 2004, ZEW Discussion Papers 04-35.

SINGH, P. German Administrative Law in Common Law Perspective, Heidelberg, 2001.

STOLL, H. Il risarcimento del danno nel diritto tedesco, in S. Patti (cur. by), Annuario di diritto tedesco, 2001, Milano, 169.

TISON, M. Challenging the Prudential Supervisor: Liability versus Regulatory Immunity, Paper prepared for the SUERF Conference «stability and efficiency of financial market in Central and Eastern Europe», Tallinn, 12-14 june 2003.

ULMER, P. Sub § 839 BGB, in Münchener Kommentar - Bürgerliches gesetzbuch - Schuldrecht - Besonderer Teil III herausgegeben von K. Rebmann - F.J. Säcker – R. Rixecker, München, 2004.

VAN AAKEN, A. Independent Administrative Agencies in Germany, in www.dirittoamministrativo.jus.unitn.it, last visited in April 2013.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-11-14

Como Citar

Poto, M. P. (2020). THE FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY IN GERMANY. REVISTA DIREITO DAS POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS, 2(1), 90–125. Recuperado de https://seer.unirio.br/rdpp/article/view/10404

Edição

Seção

Doutrina