Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.-
1. The contribution is original and unpublished and has not being evaluated for publication by another journal, otherwise explain in "Comments Editor."
-
1. The submission file is in Microsoft Word format, text editor Word 7.0 (or preceding version) with Font Trebuchet MS 11. I am aware that failure to comply with these requirements, the handwriting not be conducted and therefore summarily shelved by the publisher.
-
1. All addresses of Web pages (URLs) in the text (eg http://www.ibict.br) are activated and ready to click.
-
1. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, in About the Journal. I am aware that failure to meet the standards and requirements of bibliographic styles in preparation of the manuscript, it will be filed by the publisher.
-
1. The identification of authorship of this work was removed from the file and the. Properties option in Word, thus ensuring the confidentiality of the revised criteria, if subjected to peer review (eg articles), according to instructions available in the Assuring the Evaluation Peer Blind.
-
Original article
Study relating to original, unpublished and completed scientific research. It must follow the following structure: Introduction: present the topic, define the problem and its importance, literature review and objective. Method: (method used, description of the population/sample studied, study participants or data source, date of data collection, place of research (without mentioning the name of the institution), data collection technique, selection criteria among others, must be described in a clear, objective, comprehensive and complete manner). Enter the approval protocol number from the Research Ethics Committee and the information that the research was conducted in accordance with the required ethical standards; Results: must be presented in a logical sequence. When there are tables, graphs or figures, the information must be complementary; Discussion: (must follow the logical sequence of results, comparison with the literature and the authors' interpretation. Conclusion or Final Considerations: (must highlight the most important findings, comment on limitations and implications for future research).
Systematic Review of Literature
Uses a research method performed by synthesizing the results of original studies, quantitative or qualitative, with the objective of answering a specific question of relevance to Nursing and/or related areas. It describes in detail the process of searching for original studies, the criteria used to select those included in the review and the procedures used to synthesize the results obtained by the reviewed studies (which may or may not be meta-analysis or meta-synthesis procedures). The premises of the systematic review are: exhaustiveness in the search for studies, justified selection of studies by means of explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria and evaluation of methodological quality, as well as the use of statistical techniques to quantify the results. Maximum of 5.000 words.
Bibliometrics
Bibliometric research relies on studies conducted in bibliographic databases, indexers and abstracts, in directories and catalogs of journal titles, and in references and citations. Among others, its most frequent and most relevant field of application for this work is the identification of the thematic characteristics of the literature. In short, bibliometric research is done by studying the quantitative aspects of the production, dissemination and use of published information. Maximum of 5,000 words.
Integrative Review of the Literature
It uses a research method that presents a synthesis of multiple published studies and allows general conclusions about a particular area of knowledge, carried out in a systematic and orderly manner, and contributes to deepening knowledge of the subject under investigation. It is necessary to follow standards of methodological rigor, clarity in the presentation of results, so that the reader can identify the actual characteristics of the studies included in the review. Integrative review steps: identification of theme and selection of research hypothesis or question for the study design, establishment of criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies/sampling, or literature search, definition of information to be extracted from the selected studies/categorization of studies, assessment of studies included in the review, interpretation of results, presentation of review/knowledge synthesis. Maximum of 5.000 words.
Scope Review
It is defined as a type of study that seeks to explore the main concepts of the topic in question, investigate the dimension, scope and nature of the study, condensing and publishing the data, thus pointing out gaps in existing research. Studies in this category must follow high methodological rigor, authors are encouraged to register their protocol in the Open Science Framework – OSF (https://osf.io/). The registration number reported in the manuscript. For construction, scoping review protocols must follow the PRISMA-ScR recommendations (https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/prisma-scr/).
Copyright Notice
TRANSFER AGREEMENT COPYRIGHT I transfer copyright of the article to the Journal of Care Survey is Fundamental - Online - RPCF, so it is accepted due to electronic publishing. The copyright includes the right to reproduce in whole or in part by any means, distributing that article, including figures, photographs, and any translations. The author can also print and distribute copies of your article, stating that since the rights belong to RPCF. I declare that this manuscript is original and has not been submitted for publication, in whole or in part to other online journals or not, so BMMC in the Annals of scientific events or book chapters.
Privacy Statement
The names and addresses provided in this journal will be used exclusively for the services offered by this publication and will not be made available for other purposes or to third parties.
RPCFO understands that a possible solution for greater dissemination of knowledge is the construction of open access archives/repositories based on open files, where content can be accessed without costs and barriers of any kind. Open access archives/repositories, based on open files, are interoperable and, for this reason, can be accessed by various service providers available nationally and internationally. Thus, RPCFO allows the simultaneous publication of its content in institutional repositories and thematic open access repositories, used by scientific communities to support and broaden the dissemination of research results as well as maximize their impact, creating mechanisms to legitimize and encourage the publication of produced works.
RPCFO Cross-Reference Policy for the Crossmark Service: https://doi.org/10.9789/PRC/2175-5361