Guiding instrument analysis: contributions to realistic simulation in healthcare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.rpcfo.v16.11272Keywords:
Simulation training, Education, nursing, Higher education institutionsAbstract
Objective: to analyze a guiding instrument for Realistic Health Simulation used by a Higher Education Institution. Method: descriptive study, qualitative, with the participation of 23 professionals with degree in healthcare and experience in realistic simulation. Data collection via an online questionnaire occurred during the period from March to June 2020. Categorical thematic content analysis was used. Results: the instrument contemplates the necessary steps for the daily teaching in simulation. The category "Indispensable items for simulation planning" includes: preparation of the simulated scenario; role of professors/ facilitators in the briefing and development of the simulated scenario; role of professors / facilitators in debriefing; simulation evaluation. Conclusion: the development of this research made it possible to adapt the dimensions of Isimula, favoring clarity to the steps necessary for the simulation and contributes to supporting professors/facilitators in the planning, development and evaluation of the simulation, in different contexts of healthcare.
Downloads
References
Yamane MT, Machado VK, Osternack KT, Mello RG. Simulação realística como ferramenta de ensino na saúde: uma revisão integrativa. Rev. Espaço para a Saúde [Internet]. 2019 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 20(1): 87-107, Julho, 2019. Disponível em: http://espacoparasaude.fpp.edu.br/index.php/espacosaude/article/view/651.
KANEKO RMU, LOPES MHBM. Cenário em simulação realística em saúde: o que é relevante para a sua elaboração?*. Rev. esc. enferm. USP [Internet]. 2019 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 53:e03453. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342019000100602&lng=en.
Fabri RP, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Fonseca AS, Pedersoli CE, Miranda FBG et al . Construção de um roteiro teórico-prático para simulação clínica. Rev. esc. enferm. USP [Internet]. 2017 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 51:e03218. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/reeusp/a/BQr7hRjtgCwF3c9BsDR7Wtq/?lang=pt.
CARNEIRO KKC, MORAES FILHO IM, SANTOS OP, ARANTES AA, FÉLIS KC, GUILHERME IS. Simulação realística como instrumento no processo de ensino-aprendizagem de enfermagem. REVISA [Internet]. 2019 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 8 (3):273-84. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.36239/revisa.v8.n3.p273a284.
INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: simulationSM simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs [Internet]. 2016 [cited in 2021 Jul 28]; 12(5 Suppl):S5-S12. Available from: https://www.inacsl.org/INACSL/document-server/?cfp=INACSL/assets/File/public/standards/SOBPEnglishCombo.pdf.
Negri EC, Mazzo A, Martins JCA, Pereira Junior GA, Almeida RGS, Pedersoli CE. Simulação clínica com dramatização: ganhos percebidos por estudantes e profissionais de saúde. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2017 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 25:e2916. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692017000100604&lng=en.
Bortolato-Major C, Mantovani MF, Felix JVC, Boostel R, Silva ATM, Caravaca-Morera JA. Avaliação do debriefing na simulação clínica em enfermagem: um estudo transversal. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. Jun. 2019 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 72(3):788-794. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000300788&lng=en.
Garbuio DC, Oliveira ARS, Kameo SY, Melo ES, Dalri MCB, Carvalho EC. Simulação clínica em enfermagem: relato de experiência sobre a construção de um cenário. Rev enferm UFPE on line. [Internet]. Ago. 2016 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 10(8):3149-55. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/11388.
Vinuto JA. amostragem em bola de neve na pesquisa qualitativa: um debate em aberto. Temat. [Internet]. 2014 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 22(44):203-220. Disponível em: https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/10977.
OLIVEIRA, DC. Análise de conteúdo temático-categorial: uma proposta de sistematização. Rev. enferm. UERJ, [Internet]. 2008 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 16 (4):569-576. Disponível em: http://bases.bireme.br/cgi-bin/wxislind.exe/iah/online/?IsisScript=iah/iah.xis&src=google&base=LILACS&lang=p.
Tyerman J, Luctkar-Flude M, Graham L, Coffey S, Olsen-Lynch, E. A systematic
review of health care presimulation preparation and briefing effectiveness. Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet]. Fev. 2019 [cited in 2021 Jul 28]; 27: 12-25. Available from: https://www.nursingsimulation.org/article/S1876-1399(18)30202-0/abstract.
Fonseca LMM, Monteiro JCS, Aredes NDA, Bueno JV, Domingues AN, Coutinho VRD, Baptista RCN. Interdisciplinary simulation scenario in nursing education: Humanized childbirth and birth. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2020 [cited in 2021 Jul 28]; 28:e3286. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692020000100349&lng=en.
Groom JA, Henderson D, Sittner BJ. NLN/Jeffries Simulation Framework State of the Science Project: Simulation Design Characteristics. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. [Internet]. 2014 [cited in 2021 Jul 28]; 10(7):337-44. Available from: http://www.nursingsimulation.org/article/S1876-1399(13)00036-4/pdf#/article/S1876-1399(13)00036-4/fulltext?mobileUi=1.
Góes FSN, Jackman D. Development of an instructor guide tool: ‘Three Stages of Holistic Debriefing’. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet] 2020 [cited in 2021 Jul 28]; 28:e3229. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692020000100301&lng=en
Reiersona IA, Haukedal TA, Bjørk IT. Structured debriefing: What difference does it make?. Nurse Education in Practice [Internet]. 2017 [cited in 2021 Jul 28]; 25:104-110. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1471595316301597.
Palaganas JC, Fey M, Simon R. Structured debriefing in simulation-based education. AACN Adv Crit Care [Internet]. 2016 [cited in 2021 Jul 28]; 27(1):78-85. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26909457/.
Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): Development and Rationale for a Blended Approach to Health Care Simulation Debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare [Internet]. Abr. 2015 [cited in 2021 Jul 28]; 10(2):106-115. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/simulationinhealthcare/Fulltext/2015/04000/Promoting_Excellence_and_Reflective_Learning_in.7.aspx.
Vilarinho JOV, Felix JVC, Kalinke LP, Mazzo A, Lopes Neto FDN, Boostel R et al. Validação psicométrica do instrumento Creighton para avaliação de competências clínicas em simulação. Acta paul. enferm. [Internet]. 2020 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]; 33: eAPE20200314. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-21002020000100476&lng=p.
Corrêa VAF, Silva RF, Pereira JF. Isimula - Instrumento orientador para a Simulação Realística em Saúde. Brasil: Portal educapes, 2021 [citado em 28 Jul 2021]. Disponível em: http://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/601279.
Published
Versions
- 2024-01-12 (2)
- 2024-01-08 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Pesquisa Cuidado é Fundamental Online
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
TRANSFER AGREEMENT COPYRIGHT I transfer copyright of the article to the Journal of Care Survey is Fundamental - Online - RPCF, so it is accepted due to electronic publishing. The copyright includes the right to reproduce in whole or in part by any means, distributing that article, including figures, photographs, and any translations. The author can also print and distribute copies of your article, stating that since the rights belong to RPCF. I declare that this manuscript is original and has not been submitted for publication, in whole or in part to other online journals or not, so BMMC in the Annals of scientific events or book chapters.
