Online courses on breastfeeding as a strategy to improve the quality of care: a scoping review           /             Cursos online sobre aleitamento materno como estratégia para melhoria da qualidade assistencial: revisão de escopo

Júlia Marcuz; Júlia Domiciana Franco de Campos; Beatriz Pera de Almeida Hamasaki; Talita  Lima Corrêa de Pinho; Elenice Valentim Carmona

doi:10.9789/2175-5361.rpcfo.v15.12057

Authors

Júlia Marcuz Universidade Estadual de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5995-2650
Júlia Domiciana Franco de Campos Universidade Estadual de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6720-2657
Beatriz Pera de Almeida Hamasaki Universidade Estadual de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3766-8165
Talita Lima Corrêa de Pinho Universidade Estadual de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8300-2858
Elenice Valentim Carmona Universidade Estadual de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9976-3603

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.rpcfo.v15.12057

Keywords:

Breast Feeding; Lactation; Education distance; Health Personnel; Educational Technology.

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the scientific production on online courses on breastfeeding as a strategy to improve the quality of care. Methods: a scoping review, based on the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The electronic databases used were: PubMed; LILACS; CINAHL; SCOPUS; Web of Science; BDENF and EMBASE, published from 2015 to 2020. Results: 961 abstracts were read, 15 articles in full for the final inclusion of 9 articles. The publications occurred between 2011 and 2020, their samples ranged from 54 to 26009 participants. In only 5 studies (55.6%) some method of learning assessment was used and the most used strategy was the application of pre and post test. Conclusion: the scarcity of studies on online courses on breastfeeding as a strategy to improve the quality of care shows a gap in knowledge on the subject. It was also found the need to improve the methodological description of the published studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Júlia Marcuz, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Enfermeira, mestre em Enfermagem.

Júlia Domiciana Franco de Campos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Registered nurse, University of Campinas. Neonatal and Pediatric ICU Nursing specialist. Master's student at the College of Nursing, State University of Campinas.

Beatriz Pera de Almeida Hamasaki, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Master in Health Sciences from the State University of Campinas (2018). PhD student at the College of Nursing, State University of Campinas.

Talita Lima Corrêa de Pinho, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Registered nurse, University of Campinas

Elenice Valentim Carmona, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

PhD in Sciences (2012) from the Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP). Post-doctorate in Neonatal Nursing (2014) from the University of Texas. Associate Professor of the Undergraduate Course in Nursing, School of Nursing (FEnf) - UNICAMP.

References

World Health Organization (WHO). Essential nutrition actions: improving maternal, newborn, infant and young child health and nutrition. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 jul 20]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/84409/9789241505550_eng.pdf;jsessionid=F56F66DFEBBE872F38A9B1CAC9F016D5?sequence=1.

Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 jul 20];387(10017). Avalilable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Estudo Nacional de Alimentação e Nutrição Infantil – ENANI-2019: resultados preliminares: indicadores de aleitamento materno no Brasil. [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ; 2020 [acesso em 20 de julho de 2021]. Disponível em: https://enani.nutricao.ufrj.br/index.php/relatorios/.

Wouk K, Tully KP, Labbok MH. Systematic review of evidence for baby-friendly hospital initiative step 3: prenatal breastfeeding education. J. Hum. Lact. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 jul 20];33(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0890334416679618

Costa BCP, Veiga EV, Santos CA, Costa JC, Fava SMCL, Resck ZMR. Technology in health and its influence on nursing education. R. pesq.: cuid. fundam. Online. [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 jul 20];13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.rpcfo.v13.8534

Cherrez-Ojeda I, Vanegas E, Felix M, MataVL, Jiménez FM, Sanchez M, et al. Frequency of use, perceptions and barriers of information and communication technologies among Latin American physicians: an ecuadorian cross-sectional study. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 jul 10];13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S246253

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria MS/GM n. 188, de 3 de fevereiro de 2020. Declara Emergência em Saúde Pública de importância Nacional (ESPIN) em decorrência da Infecção Humana pelo novo Coronavírus (2019-nCoV). Diário Oficial da União 4 fev 2020; Seção 1.

Cunha ICKO, Erdmann AL, Balsanelli AP, Cunha CLF, Lopes Neto D, Ximenes Neto FRG, et al. Ações e estratégias de escolas e departamentos de enfermagem de universidades federais frente à COVID-19. Enferm. Foco. [Internet]. 2020 [citado em 12 de julho de 2021];11(1):48-57. Disponível em: http://revista.cofen.gov.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/4115/802.

Salvador PTCdO, Bezerril MdS, Mariz CMS, Fernandes MID, Martins JCA, Santos VEP. Virtual learning object and environment: a concept analysis. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 jul 10];70(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0123

Borim BC, Croti UA, Silveira PC, Marchi CH, Moscardini AC, Hickey P, et al. Development and evaluation of a continuing education program for nursing technicians at a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit in a developing country. World. J. Pediatr. Congenit. Heart. Surg. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 jul 10];8(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135117731724

Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, Editors. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer's manual [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2020 [cited 2021 jul 10]. Available from https://nursing.lsuhsc.edu/JBI/docs/ReviewersManuals/Scoping-.pdf.

Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC. Med. Res. Methodol. [Internet]. 2018 Nov 19 [cited 2021 jul 10];18(1):143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 jul 10];169. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Diretrizes metodológicas: Sistema GRADE – Manual de graduação da qualidade da evidência e força de recomendação para tomada de decisão em saúde. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.

O'Connor ME, Brown EW, Lewin LO. An internet-based education program improves breastfeeding knowledge of maternal-child healthcare providers. Breastfeed. Med. [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021 jul 10];6(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2010.0061.

Lewin LO, O’Connor ME. “BreastfeedingBasics”: web-based education that meets current knowledge competencies. J. Hum. Lact. [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 jul 20];28(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334411435990

Edwards RA, Colchamiro R, Tolan E, Browne S, Foley M, Jenkins L, et al. Online continuing education for expanding clinicians' roles in breastfeeding support. J. Hum. Lact. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 jul 20]; 31(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334415585977

Bixby C, Baker-Fox C, Deming C, Dhar V, Steele C. A multidisciplinary quality improvement approach increases breastmilk availability at discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit for the very-low-birth-weight infant. Breastfeed. Med. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Jul 10];11(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2015.0141

Watkins AL, Dodgson JE, McClain DB. Online lactation education for healthcare providers: a theoretical approach to understanding learning outcomes. J. Hum. Lact. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 jul 20];33(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417724348

Colaceci S, Giusti A, Chapin EM, Bettinelli ME, De Angelis A, Zambri F, et al. E-learning to improve healthcare professionals' attitudes and practices on breastfeeding. Breastfeed. Med. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 jul 15];12(10). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2017.0060

Freitas L, Costa L, Costa A, Avelino C, Ribeiro P, Goyatá S. Avaliação do curso online na educação permanente sobre aleitamento materno para enfermeiros. Rev. Enferm. UFSM. [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em 10 de julho de 2021];8(1). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769225925

Colaceci S, Zambri F, D’Amore C, De Angelis A, Rasi F, Pucciarelli G, et al. Long-term effectiveness of an e-learning program in improving health care professionals’ attitudes and practices on breastfeeding: a 1-year follow-up study. Breastfeed. Med. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 jul 20];15(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0203

Vilar-Compte M, Pérez-Escamilla R, Moncada M, Flores D. How much can Mexican healthcare providers learn about breastfeeding through a semi-virtual training? A propensity score matching analysis. Int. Breastfeed. J. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 jul 10];15(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-020-00297-6

Tobase L, Peres HHC, Almeida DMd, Tomazini EAS, Ramos MB, Polastri TF. Instructional design in the development of an online course on Basic Life Support. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 jul 10];51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2016043303288

Silva FFF, Costa T, Peres HHC, Duarte ED, Castral TC, Bueno M. Avaliação por especialistas do curso online “Programa de Avaliação da Dor Neonatal”. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. 2020 [acesso em 20 de julho de 2022];73(4). Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0392

Melo ECAd, Enders BC, Basto ML. Plataforma PEnsinar®: a learning tool for teaching the nursing process. Rev. Bras. Enferm. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 jul 15];71(4). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0411

van Goudoever JB, Spatz DL, Hoban R, Dumitriu D, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Berns M, et al. Updating clinical practices to promote and protect human milk and breastfeeding in a Covid-19 era. Front. Pediatr. [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 jul 10];10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.867540

Lima VV. Constructivist spiral: an active learning methodology. Interface (Botucatu). [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 jul 10];21(61). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622016.0316

Ferreira CA. Percepções de estagiários sobre as suas práticas de avaliação das aprendizagens. Educ. Rev. [Internet]. 2018 [acesso em 10 de julho de 2022];34(70). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.57563

Lefroy J, Watling C, Teunissen PW, Brand P. Guidelines on feedback for clinical education: the dos, don’ts, and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspect. Med. Educ. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2022 jul 10];4(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7

AA, Win KT, Meedya S. Effectiveness of internet-based electronic technology interventions on breastfeeding outcomes: systematic review. J. Med. Internet. Res. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 jul 10];22(5). Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/17361

Landeiro MJS, Peres HHC, Martins TV. Construção e avaliação de tecnologia educacional interativa para familiares cuidadores sobre cuidar de pessoas dependentes. Rev. Eletr. Enf. [Internet]. 2017 [acesso em 10 de julho de 22];19. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.5216/ree.v19.38115

Griffin LB, López JD, Ranney ML, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Lewkowitz AK. Effect of novel breastfeeding smartphone applications on breastfeeding rates. Breastfeed. Med. [Internet]. 2021;16(8). Availale from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2021.0012

Campos GHB, Martins I, Nunes BP. Instrumento para a avaliação da qualidade de objetos de aprendizagem [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: PUC Rio; 2008 [acesso em 10 de julho de 2022]. Disponível em: https://docplayer.com.br/39882342-Instrumento-para-a-avaliacao-da-qualidade-de-objetos-de-aprendizagem-perspectiva-do-usuario.html.